By Guest Blogger Carl Brookins
That’s the marvelous cliché that purports to drive authors crazy because it’s asked so many times in a variety of ways. All right, let’s examine the question. A friend of mine once said she thought that writers are like cosmic vacuum cleaners. They suck up all sorts of dust and detritus from the universe, massage it, group, list and categorize it, and store it until a good use for it shows up.
I do that. A few years ago, as I was wandering through some buildings at our Minnesota State Fair, I saw a man demonstrating some really sharp knives. Of course, I thought about how easy it would be to slice some flesh with one of those things. A little while later I was in one of the food buildings and a man at one of the counters was just starting to cut into a round of cheese. You know, those things that are usually round with a hard waxy covering? They come in all sizes, but these were about as big as a hockey puck, maybe a little larger. As I watched him—he had a really sharp knife too—it occurred to me that those rounds might make ideal containers. If they were carefully hollowed out you could transport a small measure of powder in them. You know, like talcum powder?
Right.
Now you take a common Aussie and British phrase meaning it’s tough, old stick, or words to that effect, and what do you get? Maybe you get this:
So there’s just one example. Places sometimes suggest stories. “Devils Island,” for example. “The Keep.” Doesn’t that sound a little ominous? What’s a “keep” anyway? I don’t know but I bet if I look it up something will come to me that might be made into a story. How about “Vermillion Drift?” Is that a place or an activity? Is it dangerous, like “Wicked Games?”
So the answer to the question is that authors get their ideas from almost any and every-where. Do you ever get the feeling when you are around an author that he or she is listening and observing you? I’ve noticed that some really good authors in a crowd of people seem to spend more time listening than they do talking. I think they are cataloging ideas and language from the people around them. Now, I wouldn’t want you to get paranoid, dear reader, but sometimes there is somebody following you. Thankfully, she isn’t green.
=====================
Before he became a mystery writer and reviewer, Brookins was a freelance photographer, worked in public television and cable TV, and was a counselor and faculty member at Metropolitan State University in Saint Paul, Minnesota. He has reviewed mystery fiction for the Saint Paul Pioneer Press and for Mystery Scene Magazine. His reviews also appear on his own internet web site, and on others, including Books n’ Bytes and ReviewingtheEvidence. Brookins writes the sailing adventure series featuring Michael Tanner and Mary Whitney, the Sean NMI Sean private investigator detective series, and a series featuring the adventures of a mid-level administrator, Jack Marsden, at an unusual urban college.
Visit Carl's web site: http://www.carlbrookins.com/
Monday, June 14, 2010
So, Where do you get your ideas?
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
WEDNESDAY'S BURNING QUESTION
Ellen Hart writes:
As writers, we all do research for our stories. What has been the most interesting research you've done? Did it help you shape the book? Or did it all end up on the cutting room floor?
As writers, we all do research for our stories. What has been the most interesting research you've done? Did it help you shape the book? Or did it all end up on the cutting room floor?
Monday, June 7, 2010
Murder As Therapy?
By Eve Sandstrom / Joanna Carl
I collect the books of Patricia Wentworth, a British writer of the 30s, 40s and 50s. In some ways her books are dreadful, but I think they are perfect bedtime reading. Her characters and plots are so predictable that they're as comforting as macaroni and cheese with a chocolate bar on top, and I've read each of her books so often that a single chapter knocks me out for at least eight hours.
I am currently reading one that I remember checking out of the library when I was in high school. My mother and I both read it, and I remember we laughed together at the solution to the crime. The reason? In Patricia Wentworth the reader can absolutely rely on one thing -- the villain will not turn out to be a sympathetic character. And this book had only one unsympathetic character, and that character was the victim. My mom and I were both stumped. (Spoiler: It finally turned out that the victim tried to kill someone else and accidently killed herself. Not very believable, but believability isn't the reason you read Mrs. Wentworth.)
Rereading this book made me think a bit about how victims should be selected.
On panels I often mention the emotional satisfactions of killing people fictionally. For example, I say, everyone who has e-mail has some so-called friend who daily sends us 'special' items -- jokes, political comment, cartoons, or poems.
The sender sees these items as inspirational or amusing.
I can guarantee that those items will not amuse or inspire the person who gets them. They will annoy and anger the recipient.
I continue this panel comment by saying, "In one of my books, I killed that person."
The panel audience never fails to respond with loud and prolonged applause.
Like Patricia Wentworth, I prefer to have both villain and victim be obnoxious -- people for whom the reader will feel no particular grief or sympathy. Does this prove I'm a mean, rotten person? I hope not. I think all it means is that I'm writing mysteries that depend on the puzzle to keep the reader interested and, yes, entertained. If the reader my books attract gets bogged down in the psychological aspects of grief, or of villainy, my mysteries are not going to be fun for them to read. If, for example, the detective's favorite uncle is the victim, he has to have died long ago, long enough ago that the viewpoint character has dealt with her grief and can get down to solving the mystery. I admit, I hate books where someone wonderful is killed and nobody seems to miss them.
Another writer, writing another type of book, may emphasize thought-provoking situations my readers would find too heavy. She may need a truly pitiful victim, maybe a child, to show how heartless the villain is. Or perhaps a cruel drug dealer who needs to be killed to justify her tough detective taking care of the matter. Or a serial killer for a serial killer who kills serial killers (sound familiar?) to handle. You gotta write what you gotta write. Each of us is different, as a reader and as a writer.
But there are still people I'm considering for the role of victim in future books, people my escapist readers would enjoy seeing dead.
How about those people who talk on their cell phones loudly in public places? Oh, sure, this is a minor annoyance. None of us is really going to kill somebody over this. Except in fiction. (The caller is overheard calling the wrong person, see? So the bad guy has to shut him up before he can reveal what he asked. Bingo! Down the elevator shaft.)
How about those guys with the loud cars who roar up and down the collector street near us in the middle of the night? No, annoying as they are, I don't intend to dig a ditch out there and flip their roaring cars over. Not in real life. But I could do it in a book.
How about snotty writers who tell others how to pick their victims. They probably deserve to face the fictional blunt instrument, too.
How about a writer who's getting a lot of hype for a first book, and thinks she/he deserves it because of its literary excellence. Almost always the book lacks literary excellence and the writer has been singled out for some other reason. I remember one who was the publisher's darling because of his unusual research technique. He's no longer publishing at all, but that first book had a heck of an ad budget, and he preened his feathers at every convention that year. When we meet these people we have to smile graciously, but it's sure fun to kill'em when we get back to the computer.
( I don't think this is simply jealousy on my part. I don't begrudge success for fellow writers most of the time. It's something about the way these particular writers handle it. Does anyone remember the New Yorker cartoon of the writer telling his girlfriend, "The worst part of my never making it big is, I could handle it." That's me.)
Anyway, when I disguise these people and shoot'em dead, it doesn't hurt them at all. And it makes me feel deeply satisfied.
===========================================
JoAnna Carl is a pseudonym for Eve K. Sandstrom, who early in the present century was president of Sisters in Crime. She writes the Chocoholic books, which feature as a detective a young woman who is business manager for a chocolate shop in an exclusive Lake Michigan resort. The ninth book will be The Chocolate Pirate Plot, due out next October. In this one the victim was not selected according to the suggestions in the preceding blog, but it you want to live, she suggests that you don't tick her off. Check out her web site here.
I collect the books of Patricia Wentworth, a British writer of the 30s, 40s and 50s. In some ways her books are dreadful, but I think they are perfect bedtime reading. Her characters and plots are so predictable that they're as comforting as macaroni and cheese with a chocolate bar on top, and I've read each of her books so often that a single chapter knocks me out for at least eight hours.
I am currently reading one that I remember checking out of the library when I was in high school. My mother and I both read it, and I remember we laughed together at the solution to the crime. The reason? In Patricia Wentworth the reader can absolutely rely on one thing -- the villain will not turn out to be a sympathetic character. And this book had only one unsympathetic character, and that character was the victim. My mom and I were both stumped. (Spoiler: It finally turned out that the victim tried to kill someone else and accidently killed herself. Not very believable, but believability isn't the reason you read Mrs. Wentworth.)
Rereading this book made me think a bit about how victims should be selected.
On panels I often mention the emotional satisfactions of killing people fictionally. For example, I say, everyone who has e-mail has some so-called friend who daily sends us 'special' items -- jokes, political comment, cartoons, or poems.
The sender sees these items as inspirational or amusing.
I can guarantee that those items will not amuse or inspire the person who gets them. They will annoy and anger the recipient.
I continue this panel comment by saying, "In one of my books, I killed that person."
The panel audience never fails to respond with loud and prolonged applause.
Like Patricia Wentworth, I prefer to have both villain and victim be obnoxious -- people for whom the reader will feel no particular grief or sympathy. Does this prove I'm a mean, rotten person? I hope not. I think all it means is that I'm writing mysteries that depend on the puzzle to keep the reader interested and, yes, entertained. If the reader my books attract gets bogged down in the psychological aspects of grief, or of villainy, my mysteries are not going to be fun for them to read. If, for example, the detective's favorite uncle is the victim, he has to have died long ago, long enough ago that the viewpoint character has dealt with her grief and can get down to solving the mystery. I admit, I hate books where someone wonderful is killed and nobody seems to miss them.
Another writer, writing another type of book, may emphasize thought-provoking situations my readers would find too heavy. She may need a truly pitiful victim, maybe a child, to show how heartless the villain is. Or perhaps a cruel drug dealer who needs to be killed to justify her tough detective taking care of the matter. Or a serial killer for a serial killer who kills serial killers (sound familiar?) to handle. You gotta write what you gotta write. Each of us is different, as a reader and as a writer.
But there are still people I'm considering for the role of victim in future books, people my escapist readers would enjoy seeing dead.
How about those people who talk on their cell phones loudly in public places? Oh, sure, this is a minor annoyance. None of us is really going to kill somebody over this. Except in fiction. (The caller is overheard calling the wrong person, see? So the bad guy has to shut him up before he can reveal what he asked. Bingo! Down the elevator shaft.)
How about those guys with the loud cars who roar up and down the collector street near us in the middle of the night? No, annoying as they are, I don't intend to dig a ditch out there and flip their roaring cars over. Not in real life. But I could do it in a book.
How about snotty writers who tell others how to pick their victims. They probably deserve to face the fictional blunt instrument, too.
How about a writer who's getting a lot of hype for a first book, and thinks she/he deserves it because of its literary excellence. Almost always the book lacks literary excellence and the writer has been singled out for some other reason. I remember one who was the publisher's darling because of his unusual research technique. He's no longer publishing at all, but that first book had a heck of an ad budget, and he preened his feathers at every convention that year. When we meet these people we have to smile graciously, but it's sure fun to kill'em when we get back to the computer.
( I don't think this is simply jealousy on my part. I don't begrudge success for fellow writers most of the time. It's something about the way these particular writers handle it. Does anyone remember the New Yorker cartoon of the writer telling his girlfriend, "The worst part of my never making it big is, I could handle it." That's me.)
Anyway, when I disguise these people and shoot'em dead, it doesn't hurt them at all. And it makes me feel deeply satisfied.
===========================================
JoAnna Carl is a pseudonym for Eve K. Sandstrom, who early in the present century was president of Sisters in Crime. She writes the Chocoholic books, which feature as a detective a young woman who is business manager for a chocolate shop in an exclusive Lake Michigan resort. The ninth book will be The Chocolate Pirate Plot, due out next October. In this one the victim was not selected according to the suggestions in the preceding blog, but it you want to live, she suggests that you don't tick her off. Check out her web site here.
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
WEDNESDAY'S BURNING QUESTION
Ellen Hart writes:
Even though ebooks are only a small percent of the books being sold today, sales are trending strongly in that direction. So here's this weeks burning question:
Have you ever taken one of your books and put it up on Kindle or Smashwords? If so, did you do it yourself or have someone else do it for you. you find the process difficult? Has it been worth your time and effort? Do you have any tips or words of wisdom for others who might be thinking of doing the same thing?
Even though ebooks are only a small percent of the books being sold today, sales are trending strongly in that direction. So here's this weeks burning question:
Have you ever taken one of your books and put it up on Kindle or Smashwords? If so, did you do it yourself or have someone else do it for you. you find the process difficult? Has it been worth your time and effort? Do you have any tips or words of wisdom for others who might be thinking of doing the same thing?
Monday, May 31, 2010
Risk Management and Other Writerly Thoughts
by Annette Meyers
So, last year I had this intriguing, exciting first line of a book or maybe a short story in my head. I’d been playing with it for months while I was finishing what I hoped would be the final draft of my new novel, and while I was serving sporadically as an arbitrator on cases for FINRA.
I’ve always worked on the start of a book this way: The first line comes and I store it away in my brain and take it out and look at it and play with it, then put it back and keep doing it until I’m ready to sit down at the computer and begin writing.
But last spring I woke in the morning and called up my intriguing first line and it didn’t come. And it didn’t come during the day. And it didn’t come during my meditation. And it didn’t come when I planted the request in my thoughts before I went to sleep at night. I couldn’t believe it. I called a long time friend (writer) and asked if this had ever happened to her. She said it had. Sometimes it comes back, sometimes it doesn’t. But it didn’t make me feel any better.
And then I was watching Mad Men one night and one of the creative team, Paul, had stayed late into the night trying to work on copy for an ad and early in the morning he had it, the perfect line. He toasted himself and fell asleep at his desk and in the morning, the line was gone. When he met with Don Draper and Peggy Olson to talk about the copy, he said he’d had the perfect line and when he woke up it was gone. And Don and Peggy both said, oh, I hate when that happens.
What I decided to do was open a file called “Opening Lines” so it will never happen to me again. The file has grown to include titles, character descriptions, dialogue, ideas, whole paragraphs. It’s become my safety net.
But my intriguing, exciting first line has never come back. What has come to me is a new opening line for my novel SOMETHING DARKER, a police procedural, and taking no chances, I typed it onto the first page for me to rewrite. It’s a police procedural because when I was asked to do a story for SISTERS ON THE CASE, I wanted to try something different and since I’d never done a police procedural, I wrote “Not Just the Facts.” I decided that my next novel would be a police procedural, and that’s exactly what SOMETHING DARKER is.
I’ve always believed that I must keep coming through a different door, keep stretching, not grow stale writing the same characters over and over. To keep challenging myself as a writer, I went from contemporary Smith and Wetzon, third person through Wetzon’s eyes, to historical (fictional poet) Olivia Brown in first person, to Maan Meyers historicals with Marty, multiple points of view and omniscient author. I’ve written short stories in present tense. I like the immediacy of
But I did a really big stretch this winter. When I wrote Olivia Brown I reacquainted myself with various poetic forms so that I could feel comfortable writing Olivia’s poems. I came across the villanelle with its rhyming and pentameter restrictions and made a note on a post-it and stuck it to a photo on my desk. This winter I began to wonder if I could turn a vicious crime story I’d clipped from the newspapers several years ago into a villanelle. I wrote “The Villain’s Villanelle,” and EQMM just told me "The Villain's Villanelle" will go on sale on June 22, in what they call the August issue.
It’s a magnificent obsession, this writing thing. Whenever I think, that’s it--especially considering the publishing climate these days and most of the editors I knew not around any--more--and I’m ready to put my feet up and read and do all the things I don’t do when I’m writing, an idea comes. But I’ve learned my lesson: This time it goes into my Opening Lines files.
===============================
Annette Meyers is the author of eight Smith and Wetzon Wall Street mysteries, two Olivia Brown 1920s mysteries, and a standalone suspense novel: Repentances. As Maan Meyers, she and her husband Martin have written seven history mysteries and numerous short stories set in New York in the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries. One of Annette’s short stories was included in Best American Mystery Stories, 2002. She was the 10th president of Sister in Crime and serves on the board of the International Association of Crime Writers, NA. Website: http://www.meyersmysteries.com/
So, last year I had this intriguing, exciting first line of a book or maybe a short story in my head. I’d been playing with it for months while I was finishing what I hoped would be the final draft of my new novel, and while I was serving sporadically as an arbitrator on cases for FINRA.
I’ve always worked on the start of a book this way: The first line comes and I store it away in my brain and take it out and look at it and play with it, then put it back and keep doing it until I’m ready to sit down at the computer and begin writing.
But last spring I woke in the morning and called up my intriguing first line and it didn’t come. And it didn’t come during the day. And it didn’t come during my meditation. And it didn’t come when I planted the request in my thoughts before I went to sleep at night. I couldn’t believe it. I called a long time friend (writer) and asked if this had ever happened to her. She said it had. Sometimes it comes back, sometimes it doesn’t. But it didn’t make me feel any better.
And then I was watching Mad Men one night and one of the creative team, Paul, had stayed late into the night trying to work on copy for an ad and early in the morning he had it, the perfect line. He toasted himself and fell asleep at his desk and in the morning, the line was gone. When he met with Don Draper and Peggy Olson to talk about the copy, he said he’d had the perfect line and when he woke up it was gone. And Don and Peggy both said, oh, I hate when that happens.
What I decided to do was open a file called “Opening Lines” so it will never happen to me again. The file has grown to include titles, character descriptions, dialogue, ideas, whole paragraphs. It’s become my safety net.
But my intriguing, exciting first line has never come back. What has come to me is a new opening line for my novel SOMETHING DARKER, a police procedural, and taking no chances, I typed it onto the first page for me to rewrite. It’s a police procedural because when I was asked to do a story for SISTERS ON THE CASE, I wanted to try something different and since I’d never done a police procedural, I wrote “Not Just the Facts.” I decided that my next novel would be a police procedural, and that’s exactly what SOMETHING DARKER is.
I’ve always believed that I must keep coming through a different door, keep stretching, not grow stale writing the same characters over and over. To keep challenging myself as a writer, I went from contemporary Smith and Wetzon, third person through Wetzon’s eyes, to historical (fictional poet) Olivia Brown in first person, to Maan Meyers historicals with Marty, multiple points of view and omniscient author. I’ve written short stories in present tense. I like the immediacy of
But I did a really big stretch this winter. When I wrote Olivia Brown I reacquainted myself with various poetic forms so that I could feel comfortable writing Olivia’s poems. I came across the villanelle with its rhyming and pentameter restrictions and made a note on a post-it and stuck it to a photo on my desk. This winter I began to wonder if I could turn a vicious crime story I’d clipped from the newspapers several years ago into a villanelle. I wrote “The Villain’s Villanelle,” and EQMM just told me "The Villain's Villanelle" will go on sale on June 22, in what they call the August issue.
It’s a magnificent obsession, this writing thing. Whenever I think, that’s it--especially considering the publishing climate these days and most of the editors I knew not around any--more--and I’m ready to put my feet up and read and do all the things I don’t do when I’m writing, an idea comes. But I’ve learned my lesson: This time it goes into my Opening Lines files.
===============================
Annette Meyers is the author of eight Smith and Wetzon Wall Street mysteries, two Olivia Brown 1920s mysteries, and a standalone suspense novel: Repentances. As Maan Meyers, she and her husband Martin have written seven history mysteries and numerous short stories set in New York in the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries. One of Annette’s short stories was included in Best American Mystery Stories, 2002. She was the 10th president of Sister in Crime and serves on the board of the International Association of Crime Writers, NA. Website: http://www.meyersmysteries.com/
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
What We Did At Malice Domestic
Click on this link below to find out all the wonderful things that happened at Malice Domestic--and Sisters In Crime was there!
Sisters in Crime
Sisters in Crime
Monday, May 24, 2010
Let's Be Honest: Success Equals Fame and Big Bucks
By Guest Blogger Elizabeth Sims
Not long ago I spoke on a panel of authors, agents, and editors in a bookstore in Alaska. As we took our places in front of the audience, I wondered, "What are aspiring authors in Alaska like?"
My unasked question was answered by a man in the front row who raised his hand. "We all know we're supposed to just be glad that we write," he said. "We're supposed to not care whether we get a big contract or not. But let's be honest: we all want to make it big, we all want to write bestsellers, we all want to be famous, and we all want to be millionaires. Now my question to you people is: what's the main thing I have to do to get there?"
In other words, aspiring authors in Alaska are exactly like aspiring authors everywhere. I admired that man's honesty. Indeed, although I've reached the enviable level of midlist author, I'm just like him. I too want to make it big and all the rest. Especially the millions of dollars. Hell, yes!
Which provokes the question: how should an author define success?
Most amateur writers I talk to are shocked to learn that none—none—of F. Scott Fitzgerald's books were in print when he died. He was a has-been in his own time. That's happened to tons of tremendously talented authors. Worse still, any of us can point to some bestselling idiot who doesn't have a tenth of the talent we do.
The writing life ain't fair and that's that.
However, I have no patience for writing experts who tell aspiring authors things like, "Forget fame and fortune. Odds are against you ever achieving them with your writing." When somebody says that, I want to kill her. I want to hack off her head with a machete and kick it down a ravine.
Life is tough enough for authors without that bullshit. We know we've chosen a challenging path. We know, empirically and intuitively, that the odds are against us. Anybody attempting to do something extraordinary knows the odds are long. Win a marathon, develop a new cancer drug, find a lost civilization, be CEO before age 30, write a book, get a book published, have a big-time successful writing career.
The paradox is this: if you believe the odds are against you, you won't produce your best work. Why? Because you'll be too busy battling depression. It's damaging to listen to naysayers, especially ones disguised as helpers.
You've got to act as if the odds are in your favor. You've got to believe it in your heart or you're doomed.
You've got to believe that you'll achieve everything you can dream of: Glowing reviews, a thick stream of royalty checks, booksignings attended not only by your friends and relatives but by strangers who have actually read and loved your books. You've got to be able to visualize an ugly little statuette of a man's head with a painted-on mustache sitting in a place of prominence on your shelf. If you do that, you'll find yourself committed to developing your talent as far as it can go. You'll have a shot at the big time.
Believe. That's my answer to the man in Alaska.
=====================================
Elizabeth Sims is the author of the Rita Farmer mysteries (The Extra, The Actress, and the forthcoming On Location) as well as the Lambda Award-winning Lillian Byrd mysteries. She is also a Contributing Editor at Writer's Digest magazine, where she specializes in the art and craft of fiction. Her formative years were spent investigating the lives of Nancy Drew, Laura Ingalls, and Sherlock Holmes, as well as making gunpowder in the basement with her chemistry set. Now, as a published crime author, she's living proof that studying literature and misbehaving with reactive compounds can work out. She's a member of Mystery Writers of America, Sisters in Crime, and Mensa International. www.elizabethsims.com.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
WEDNESDAY'S BURNING QUESTION
Discipline is a vital trait for a writer. I often point out to my classes that, although it may seem axiomatic and thus unnecessary to say, the person who gets published is the person who finishes the book. And that leads me to my question:
Do you write every day? Do you write a certain number of pages or words when you work, or do you sit in your chair and write for x-number of hours, no matter what you get done?
Monday, May 17, 2010
Crime Fiction—the Odd Cousin?
By Guest Blogger L.J. Sellers
“Does the crime writer sit in the same chair at the table of literature as a transvestite cousin at a family gathering?”
Say what?
That question came to me, via Facebook, from a researcher working on a PhD dissertation about the mystery/crime genre. The analogy both amused and disheartened me. Over the years, I’ve tried to accept that genre fiction isn’t counted in the same category as literary fiction. I’ve tried to ignore the occasions where a reviewer declared that a particular mystery or thriller “transcends the genre,” as if crime fiction had built-in limitations and readers had to approach it with low expectations.
But now that I’ve been compared to an "odd" cousin, I have to respond. What a load of nonsense.
From my perspective, crime fiction offers the best reading on nearly every level. The genre confronts the realities of life across various cultures more often and more honestly than mainstream/literary fiction does.
Crime novels are suited to exploring provocative social issues and showing how those hot-button subjects affect various people’s lives, often from diverse perspectives. Crime fiction can be surprisingly poignant and analytical about problems such as illegal immigration, human trafficking, and drug use. These novels highlight deep-rooted cultural ills such as racism, sexism, bigotry, and the dangers of stereotypes. Sometimes a mystery will show a stereotype in all its glory, reminding us of why stereotypes exist and how we all fit into one … at least a little bit. The crime genre often forces us to see the world from perspectives that make us think outside our comfort zone.
As crime writers and readers, we get to make sense of things that would otherwise haunt us. We learn why the family next door disappeared one day or what’s really going on in the creepy warehouse across the street. Sometimes that knowledge helps us sleep better and sometimes it doesn’t, but at least we learn one version of the truth.
Police procedurals and thrillers give us a medium through which we can experience the triumph of good over evil. For short while with each story, we get to be the good guy, the hero who rescues the kidnapped child or saves the president’s life. We get to drag the bad guys off to jail or shoot them dead if “they need killing”— fantasies we can’t act out in our everyday lives. The real-world events around us can be unjust and inexplicable. It’s important to our collective mental health to experience justice, order, and revelation through fiction.
Novels with well-written protagonists and antagonists bring us to terms with the duality within ourselves. Humans are all deeply flawed, with the capacity for great goodness as well as for deceit, jealousy, schadenfreude, addiction, selfishness, and often worse. When crime fiction heroes—detectives, FBI agents, and prosecutors—possess such flaws, we not only relate to those characters, we forgive ourselves for the same shortcomings. When a killer calls his mother or pets a stray dog, we hate him a little less and remember to look for good qualities in everyone.
Crime novels explore relationships in a way that few other genres can. What better mechanism to test a bond between husband and wife, parent and child, or lifelong friends than to embroil the relationship in a crime, either as victims, suspects, or perpetrators. Similar to natural disasters, the aftermath of a crime can bring out the best—or worst—in humans.
The genre is rich with possibilities for exploring the complexity of the human condition. Victims become predators; predators become victims. A person is guilty, but not in the way we’ve been led to believe. Most of all, crime fiction is full of surprises, and we readers love the unexpected. When was the last time a reviewer used the word twist when discussing a literary novel?
If the detective writer is the odd cousin at the literary family gathering, then perhaps the family is a bit dysfunctional to begin with.
===================================
L.J. Sellers is an award-winning journalist, editor, and the author of the Detective Jackson mystery/suspense series. The first two books, The Sex Club and Secrets to Die For, have been highly praised, and the third book, Thrilled to Death, will be released in August. Her next two novels, Passions of the Dead and The Baby Thief, will be published in 2011. When not plotting murders, L.J. enjoys performing standup comedy, cycling, social networking, attending mystery conferences, and editing fiction manuscripts. Be sure to visit L.J.'s web site.
L.J. Sellers is an award-winning journalist, editor, and the author of the Detective Jackson mystery/suspense series. The first two books, The Sex Club and Secrets to Die For, have been highly praised, and the third book, Thrilled to Death, will be released in August. Her next two novels, Passions of the Dead and The Baby Thief, will be published in 2011. When not plotting murders, L.J. enjoys performing standup comedy, cycling, social networking, attending mystery conferences, and editing fiction manuscripts. Be sure to visit L.J.'s web site.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
WEDNESDAY'S BURNING QUESTION
We all collect ideas. I’ve often thought of writers as cosmic vacuum cleaners, sucking up everything around them. When we need something, we look into the bag. Many of us write novels and short stories. Thus, today’s burning question is:
How do you know when you have a novel-length idea vs. a short story idea? Is there a difference? Is it all in the writing?
Monday, May 10, 2010
Finding A Way
By Carolyn Hart
I would love to say after publishing 44 books that I have captured the magic elixir and that I toss off books as easily as a conjuror pulls a rabbit from a top hat.
No.
Writing is hard. Always. Every book is a challenge. If I knew more about magic and top hats, very likely I would realize that producing a rabbit is always a challenge, too. Nothing worth doing is easy.
Every book is like climbing a new, taller, more dangerous mountain, a crevasse here, a slippery rock there, an unexpected overhang blocking the way. But when a writer reaches the top, that rarefied perch with the earth spread below, the writer has gained in skill. I don’t pretend to have many answers, much less all the answers, but I can share some techniques that I have learned over the years in writing classic puzzles.
Long ago as an aspiring writer I was informed that YOU MUST OUTLINE. That is not true for many writers. For some, for those whose minds can entertain the far flung needs of a story from the outset, an outline is essential and their way to begin. For as many authors, myself included, there will never be a formal outline.
Here is what I know when I begin: the protagonist(s), the victim, the identity of the murderer and the motive, the setting, and a working title. I am a "what if" writer. The story happens as I write. To me, that affords joy in writing. In Death of the Party, Annie and Max Darling go to a remote sea island to investigate a death which occurred a year earlier. Early in the book, Max decides to take a walk about the island. On a path in the woods, he hears someone approaching. As he comes around a bend, he meets a burly, muscular, middle-aged man. I had no idea what Max would find when he set out on the walk. I was as surprised as he at the unexpected encounter. The new character becomes very important in the book and I didn’t know he was coming.
I am suggesting that you can discover a book by letting your main character take a walk or pick up the phone or run after a taxi or climb a fire escape. What if . . .
Be particular about your characters’ names. I try to have each name begin with a different letter. I have so many recurring characters in the Death on Demand series that occasionally names will begin with the same letter, but it is rare. Make it easy for readers by using names that sound and look different.
Present clues fairly to the readers while hiding them in plain sight. I have a short passage in Deadly Valentine in which I describe an older man who is a murder victim. The reader will not be surprised because his unpleasant personality was described. The description also included the inference that he was impotent and that was a major clue. However, to the reader the emphasis was on his nasty disposition.
Readers are accustomed to attending movies and sorting out the hero and the villain by the action. You don’t have to tell readers. Let them see for themselves. Often when I write a scene, I summarize too much because I’m focused on the main point I want to achieve. I find that I’ve told the readers. I go back and rewrite and let the readers see and hear and feel what led up to the important action in the scene.
When I had written about 23 books, I had a Eureka moment. I don’t outline before I start, but I outline as I am writing. That way I have a breakdown of the action and can easily find a certain passage if I feel it needs changes. I write the outline by chapters in a yellow legal pad. In the left margin, I write the day and time and, if important, weather. I also write the ms. page numbers.
As I write, I make notes about what I want to add or subtract or modify and I have many, many scraps of paper floating around. It isn’t orderly, but it captures fleeting thoughts that can make a difference in the ms.
When writing a scene, I am always aware that the protagonist has a goal and I as author have a goal. Annie Darling in the opening pages of The Christie Caper is thinking about getting ready for a marvelous party to kick off her conference in honor of Agatha Christie. That is her goal. My goal is to introduce important characters to the reader.
Treat editors with courtesy and respect. They are editors because they love books. On occasion an editor will not be helpful, but most editorial suggestions will be helpful. The editor can see the forest when the author is lost in the trees.
I have been blessed with extraordinarily good editors. Sometimes I decline to make a suggested change, but often I see that I can indeed improve the scene. In Deadly Valentine, the editor suggested that I introduce the main characters before Annie Darling encounters them at a Valentine Ball. I had Annie’s ditzy mother-in-law invite Annie down to the dock where Laurel casually inquires about the residences ringing the lagoon. As Annie describes her neighbors, the reader meets these characters before the crush of the ball. The editor made the suggestion that the characters be introduced. It was up to me as the author to figure out how to accomplish that task.
The challenge in writing is that it is always hard. The joy is that once the first draft is done, writing is fun. At that point, you have the book. Take that ms., mold and smooth and straighten and correct. When the work is done, be proud. You have created a story that no one else could have written.
God Bless.
=======
An accomplished master of mystery, Carolyn Hart is the author of over forty crime novels in three different series. Her books have won multiple Agatha, Anthony and Macavity awards. Her latest release is Laughed 'Til He Died. She lives in Oklahoma City, and is one of the founders of Sisters in Crime. Visit her website at: www.carolynhart.com
I would love to say after publishing 44 books that I have captured the magic elixir and that I toss off books as easily as a conjuror pulls a rabbit from a top hat. No.
Writing is hard. Always. Every book is a challenge. If I knew more about magic and top hats, very likely I would realize that producing a rabbit is always a challenge, too. Nothing worth doing is easy.
Every book is like climbing a new, taller, more dangerous mountain, a crevasse here, a slippery rock there, an unexpected overhang blocking the way. But when a writer reaches the top, that rarefied perch with the earth spread below, the writer has gained in skill. I don’t pretend to have many answers, much less all the answers, but I can share some techniques that I have learned over the years in writing classic puzzles.
Long ago as an aspiring writer I was informed that YOU MUST OUTLINE. That is not true for many writers. For some, for those whose minds can entertain the far flung needs of a story from the outset, an outline is essential and their way to begin. For as many authors, myself included, there will never be a formal outline.
Here is what I know when I begin: the protagonist(s), the victim, the identity of the murderer and the motive, the setting, and a working title. I am a "what if" writer. The story happens as I write. To me, that affords joy in writing. In Death of the Party, Annie and Max Darling go to a remote sea island to investigate a death which occurred a year earlier. Early in the book, Max decides to take a walk about the island. On a path in the woods, he hears someone approaching. As he comes around a bend, he meets a burly, muscular, middle-aged man. I had no idea what Max would find when he set out on the walk. I was as surprised as he at the unexpected encounter. The new character becomes very important in the book and I didn’t know he was coming.
I am suggesting that you can discover a book by letting your main character take a walk or pick up the phone or run after a taxi or climb a fire escape. What if . . .
Be particular about your characters’ names. I try to have each name begin with a different letter. I have so many recurring characters in the Death on Demand series that occasionally names will begin with the same letter, but it is rare. Make it easy for readers by using names that sound and look different.
Present clues fairly to the readers while hiding them in plain sight. I have a short passage in Deadly Valentine in which I describe an older man who is a murder victim. The reader will not be surprised because his unpleasant personality was described. The description also included the inference that he was impotent and that was a major clue. However, to the reader the emphasis was on his nasty disposition.
Readers are accustomed to attending movies and sorting out the hero and the villain by the action. You don’t have to tell readers. Let them see for themselves. Often when I write a scene, I summarize too much because I’m focused on the main point I want to achieve. I find that I’ve told the readers. I go back and rewrite and let the readers see and hear and feel what led up to the important action in the scene.
When I had written about 23 books, I had a Eureka moment. I don’t outline before I start, but I outline as I am writing. That way I have a breakdown of the action and can easily find a certain passage if I feel it needs changes. I write the outline by chapters in a yellow legal pad. In the left margin, I write the day and time and, if important, weather. I also write the ms. page numbers.
As I write, I make notes about what I want to add or subtract or modify and I have many, many scraps of paper floating around. It isn’t orderly, but it captures fleeting thoughts that can make a difference in the ms.
When writing a scene, I am always aware that the protagonist has a goal and I as author have a goal. Annie Darling in the opening pages of The Christie Caper is thinking about getting ready for a marvelous party to kick off her conference in honor of Agatha Christie. That is her goal. My goal is to introduce important characters to the reader.
Treat editors with courtesy and respect. They are editors because they love books. On occasion an editor will not be helpful, but most editorial suggestions will be helpful. The editor can see the forest when the author is lost in the trees.
I have been blessed with extraordinarily good editors. Sometimes I decline to make a suggested change, but often I see that I can indeed improve the scene. In Deadly Valentine, the editor suggested that I introduce the main characters before Annie Darling encounters them at a Valentine Ball. I had Annie’s ditzy mother-in-law invite Annie down to the dock where Laurel casually inquires about the residences ringing the lagoon. As Annie describes her neighbors, the reader meets these characters before the crush of the ball. The editor made the suggestion that the characters be introduced. It was up to me as the author to figure out how to accomplish that task.
The challenge in writing is that it is always hard. The joy is that once the first draft is done, writing is fun. At that point, you have the book. Take that ms., mold and smooth and straighten and correct. When the work is done, be proud. You have created a story that no one else could have written.
God Bless.
=======
An accomplished master of mystery, Carolyn Hart is the author of over forty crime novels in three different series. Her books have won multiple Agatha, Anthony and Macavity awards. Her latest release is Laughed 'Til He Died. She lives in Oklahoma City, and is one of the founders of Sisters in Crime. Visit her website at: www.carolynhart.com
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
WEDNESDAY'S BURNING QUESTION
Ellen Hart writes:
When I started writing the Jane Lawless novels, Jane was 37 and I was almost forty. Twenty years later, Jane is just about to turn 45 and I’ve just turned sixty. Clearly, Jane has aged better than I have. Here’s today’s question:
How do you handle the passage of time in your mystery series? Is it realistic? Since most of us do a book a year, is the story always one year later? Does your protagonist age in real time?
Monday, May 3, 2010
THE BUSINESS OF WRITING
by Margaret Maron
I have yet to meet a writer who doesn’t want to quit her day job and write full time, but I’ve met lots of writers who don’t pay enough attention to the business aspects of writing and who wind up giving the IRS money they could have kept in their own pockets.
I am not a tax expert and I certainly don’t play one on television, but these are some of the things I’ve learned about the tax code along the way to becoming a fulltime writer. If you proceed with caution and don’t try to carry your fictional skills too far over onto your 1040 form, you should be okay with the IRS.
First off, is writing your hobby or is it your business? You’ve always loved to write and now you’ve sold some short stories for a few hundred dollars or you received a modest advance on your first book and then didn’t sell anything else for a couple of years. Are you a professional writer or not? If you aren’t sure, then go to the IRS website and search for “FS-2007-18, April 2007 - Business or Hobby?” The guidelines laid out there are fairly simple, especially the statement: “The IRS presumes that an activity is carried on for profit if it makes a profit during at least three of the last five tax years, including the current year.” That’s the key. Three out of the last five years. It doesn’t have to be a large profit, just enough that the IRS won’t audit you because you deducted your writing expenses as losses those other two years.
So what are business expenses? To quote FS-2007-18 again, “An ordinary expense is an expense that is common and accepted in the taxpayer’s trade or business. A necessary expense is one that is appropriate for the business.”
In other words, a plain-vanilla computer would be an ordinary expense. A high-end computer with all the bells and whistles could also be considered appropriate for a writer. So would a camera to document scenes for your book. A weekly manicure to keep your nails short for typing? Don’t bet on it. But a trip to England might be.
Most writers don’t earn as much as doctors or lawyers or bankers, but we get to deduct everything they can; and because our “work product” grows out of our imagination and experience, we get to deduct almost everything that feeds that imagination: magazines, newspapers, professional and trade journals for research, membership in professional organizations (Sisters in Crime, MWA, Authors Guild), registration fees for related conferences, writing classes, every penny you spend in a book store or office supply store, expenses related to your website, and trips to exotic locales where your books are set.
Repeat after me: All travel is research. Never mind that the kids are along or that you’re visiting your sick Aunt Minnie in Toledo. Hey, you might want to set a scene on a cruise ship or in Disney World or in Toledo. Who knows? You do not actually have to write a scene set on a cruise ship or in Disney World or Toledo as long as you take a few notes and keep a log. Most cities have book stores and libraries. If you arrange to go by and sign stock at the store or to speak at the library, then it’s automatically a business trip. A trip to Venice resulted in a short story that I sold to EQMM and my accountant thought that deducting 80% of my expenses for the whole trip was reasonable. I took notes along the way and I kept a log.
If you don’t have a log, please go out and get one right now—your mileage to get to the store and the cost of the log itself are both tax-deductible. Force yourself to use it. Yes, your favorite electronic gizmo can record data, too, but an old-fashioned paper log will never disappear into an electronic black hole. I use one of those week-at-a-glance calendar books and staple a flat plastic bag inside the back cover. Every trip into town to buy a ballpoint pen, an ink cartridge or a ream of paper is a business trip. I record the miles in red ink at the top of that day’s space along with the cost of the supplies, and put the receipts in the plastic bag. If you had lunch that day with your writing group, you can jot down a note or two about any writing or publishing tips that you might have picked up, along with the cost of your “business lunch.”
At the end of the year, I hand the log to whoever’s doing my taxes and all she has to do is add up the red figures. She doesn’t have to look at the receipts, but they are there should the IRS start asking questions. Again though, the IRS recognizes the validity of logs, especially when backed up by receipts or cancelled checks. You will be amazed at how quickly mileage and expenses will add up. At 50¢ a mile, I can document about 4500 business miles a year. That’s a deductible worth $2250.
Then there’s per diem, the amount you can claim over and above hotel and airfare for the various cities you visit to promote your books or do research.
For example, say you’re going to Bouchercon in San Francisco this fall. You can deduct all travel expenses: your mileage to and from the airport, your parking fees, your air fare, your transportation from airport to the hotel, your hotel room, the $2 you will leave on the bathroom counter for the maid every morning (you do tip the maid every day, don’t you?), the cab you’ll take to a restaurant to meet your editor or agent, etc.
Google “Per diem rates” and you’ll see that for the year 2010, the IRS will allow you to deduct $71 a day for your meals and incidental expenses in San Francisco. (In Toledo, it’s only $51. Sorry, Aunt Minnie!) Yes, you could list your meals and incidentals individually, but it’s simpler just to take the per diem rate rather than try to get a receipt for every hot dog, drink, or tube of toothpaste. Your accountant will appreciate it, too.
Speaking of which, the accountant’s fees are deductible as are payments to a research assistant, a web guru, or anyone hired to help you in your work as a writer.
If you rent an office, all expenses related to it are deductible. If you have an office in your home, you can deduct a percentage of your mortgage, taxes, insurance, utilities, and the new roof. The definition here is that your work space is that part of your home “used regularly and exclusively in your work.” This means you can’t claim the whole dining room if the family still eats dinner there every evening. But you can claim a corner of any room where you regularly work if those few square feet are maintained exclusively for your work.
Again though, let me state for the record that I am not a tax lawyer nor an accountant, so if in doubt, talk to an IRS agent. They can be very helpful and will sometimes suggests deductions you may not have thought of. (I’ll never forget the time an IRS agent told a friend’s husband, “She’s hired you to be her chauffeur and body guard? Then you can deduct your gym fees to stay in shape!”) For what it’s worth though, I’ve been following these modest practices for thirty years and have never been audited even though I claim several thousand in deductible expenses every year. Good citizens should gladly pay their honest share of taxes, but nothing says you have to pay more than that unless you’re too lazy to document your deductions.
Good luck and here’s hoping you’ll soon earn enough to think about becoming an S-Corp
=================================================
=================================================
Margaret Maron is a founding member and former president of Sisters in Crime. Her current book is Sand Sharks. The 16th in her Judge Deborah Knott series, Christmas Mourning, will be published November 2010. Visit her web site: http://www.margaretmaron.com/
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
WEDNESDAY'S BURNING QUESTION
How do you know when you’ve got a good idea for a mystery? Does a choir of angles start singing in your head? Do you feel as if you’ve been struck by lighting?
Monday, April 26, 2010
I'm Erin Hart, and I write slowly.
My name is Erin, and I’m a slow writer.
We’re talking tortoise-speed. Molasses-in-January slow.
I don’t suppose that comes as a complete surprise to anyone who knows me well. In medieval history class years ago, each student had to come up with an emblem for a personal coat of arms. Mine featured a snail couchant (how else?), and the motto, “L’escargot, c’est moi.”
I could make up a whole lot of excuses, or tell you that I work slowly on purpose, deliberately honing and shaping language, setting up a strong sense of place, developing three-dimensional characters, gathering up and tying all the disparate plotlines into a delightfully satisfying knot. I’d like to say that I’m just that choosy about what I put down on the page.
But the plain truth is that I have no idea how to write any faster.
One of the main reasons that I’m so slow is that I have no idea who the killer is when I begin writing a book. Seriously. (And by the way, that’s true of about ninety percent of crime writers I’ve polled over the years.) I may have some theories about whodunit, but sometimes I’m completely off the mark.
As a result, my novels develop at a pace that is somewhat leisurely (some might even say glacial), but it’s a fact that seems quite beyond my control. So when people ask, “What’s your typical writing day like?” I’ve taken to quoting Oscar Wilde:
“I was working on the proof of one of my poems all the morning, and took out a comma. In the afternoon I put it back again.”
Some days are like that. Or worse. All right, so a lot of the agony of creation is just second-guessing oneself, riding the see-saw over every adverb and pronoun, endlessly tweaking dialogue and description, tossing out page after page of drecky first, second, and third drafts, and re-reading prose that seemed so brilliant yesterday only to find that it’s turned to absolute rubbish in the space of twenty-four hours.
I first heard the story that inspired my first novel, HAUNTED GROUND, in the summer of 1986: two brothers cutting turf in the west of Ireland stumbled upon the perfectly-preserved, severed head of a beautiful red-haired girl. Although my first instinct said that I’d just been handed a perfect opening for a mystery, I didn’t write a single word of that story for a full decade. In my own defense, there was a hurdle. Just a minor thing, really—I wasn’t a writer. Had never written anything except a few angst-ridden songs as an angst-ridden teenager, plus all the usual term papers for school. I never had dreams of becoming a writer. I always read like a fiend, but somehow writing books was outside the sphere of possibility. Until I heard the story of that red-haired girl. She continued to haunt me, eventually forcing me to try my hand—even ten years later.
I began writing HAUNTED GROUND in 1996. As I recall, Frank McCourt had just published ANGELA’S ASHES, which won huge critical acclaim and became an instant bestseller. And as I also recall, my wonderfully patient agent kept urging me to hurry up and finish my novel before all things Irish went out of fashion. (Not realizing, I guess, that thanks to the Famine and resulting diaspora, Irish-ness has never gone out of fashion, and probably never will.)
So HAUNTED GROUND came along at its own pace, which turned out to be roughly sixteen years from initial idea to publication. There are probably several main reasons for its long gestation: I was pretty busy, working full time, and freelancing as a theater critic and writing teacher. I had never written a novel and had to learn how to construct a mystery as I went along. (In this one respect, ignorance was my friend—I didn’t know that I couldn’t write a novel, because I’d never tried.) On top of all that, I also had to do an awful lot of research—reading dozens of books, interviewing experts on wetland and dryland archaeology, forensic science, museum preservation, antiquities, Irish history, architecture, police procedure—the list goes on and on. Finally, there was that pesky streak of perfectionism that made me re-work the manuscript over and over again, trying to make the story on the page at least approach the complex, utterly brilliant story that existed in my imagination.
Some writers can actually make a plan and churn out so many hundred words a day. Or they schedule six months for research, three months for a first draft, and three months for revision, and voilá—at the end of a year they have a finished manuscript. Although writing is my full-time job these days, my so-called “process” is completely unpredictable and organic. The initial idea generates the first few chapters, and (ideally) a setting and a theme to explore. The setting and theme in turn trigger the research; the research scours up all sorts of interesting details and connections that go back into the story through the plot and characters. Eventually, the process becomes ever more circular: one thing feeds the other, to the point that the writing and the research become virtually inseparable. For me, there’s no other way to fashion the many layers necessary for a satisfying story.
“Surely it gets easier with the second or third book?” hopeful readers sometimes ask. “Once you get the hang of it.”
In fact, LAKE OF SORROWS, my second book, seemed to follow directly on the heels of the first—it was published just eighteen months after HAUNTED GROUND, even though it actually took three years to write, most of that time that was invisible to readers, since it was masked by the two full years of editing, design, promotion, and marketing that it takes to launch a debut novelist these days.
FALSE MERMAID, the third and latest in the series, also had quite a long gestation—five and a half years from inception to publication. To be honest, the third book was a real struggle—partly because it was such a different animal from the first two: much more psychological, and much more focused on the experiences of a single character, pathologist Nora Gavin. I struggled with the fragments of backstory I’d set up in the previous books—Nora’s sister TrÃona had been murdered, most likely by her husband, but I didn’t want to make it an open-and-shut case. If it were that simple, I told myself, the crime would have been solved long ago. No, there had to be something extra mysterious about Nora’s sister and the circumstances that led to her terrible death. And then there was my own penchant for parallel mysteries, one contemporary and one historical, that would somehow come together at the end of the book. It also didn’t help that most of FALSE MERMAID was set in Saint Paul, Minnesota—my wonderful home town, but far from the exotic and other-worldly Irish locales that usually get my creative juices flowing.
So it took a while. And people started to get impatient. In the last few months before FALSE MERMAID was finished, I was out weeding the garden, and a neighbor’s car came screeching to a halt at the curb. She rolled down the window: “Where’s the new book?”
A few weeks later, just before the first frost, I was painting the trim around our new garage door. Another neighbor, out walking her dog, stopped to ask, “What are you doing out here? Why aren’t you inside writing?”
When at last I had galleys in hand, and began making calls to bookstores, Sara Barnes from Booked for Murder in Madison, Wisconsin, said she got questioned fairly often about when I’d have a new book out: “I try to explain that you probably have a personal life. No one gives a rip. Sorry, but they want you chained to that desk.”
After FALSE MERMAID was released on March 2, the most wonderful (and depressing) reader response went something like this: “I gobbled it up in a single sitting! When is your next book out?”
I guess I still don’t have the hang of writing novels on a tight schedule. I’m beginning to get the feeling that I never will. For now, I just have to accept the way I work (see escargot reference, above) and continue to forge ahead.
I’m thinking of starting a support group for slow writers.
Here’s hoping that in Book Four, I’ll find out whodunit sooner rather than later. I’ve got a killer opening: a man driving a backhoe discovers a car buried in a bog... with the body of a ninth-century monk in the boot. “How on earth did a ninth-century monk get into the boot of a car?” I hear you ask.
Honest answer? Right now, I haven’t the foggiest. But I’m planning to have fun figuring it out!
=================================
=================================

Before straying serendipitously into crime fiction, Erin Hart worked as an arts administrator, editor, copywriter, journalist and theater critic. Her debut novel, HAUNTED GROUND (Scribner, 2003), introduced Irish archaeologist Cormac Maguire and American pathologist Nora Gavin. In addition to being included on several "Best" lists, HAUNTED GROUND won the Friends of American Writers award and Romantic Times' Best First Mystery, was shortlisted for Anthony and Agatha awards, and translated into eleven foreign languages. LAKE OF SORROWS (Scribner, 2004) was shortlisted for a Minnesota Book Award and also published around the world. FALSE MERMAID, third in the series, was published by Scribner in March 2010 to broad critical acclaim. Erin and her husband, Irish button accordionist Paddy Orien, live in Minnesota and travel frequently to Ireland. Visit her website at: http://www.erinhart.com/.
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Did Someone Say Free Money?
By Ellen Hart
Yup, Sisters in Crime did. And not just any free money. I’m talking about the We Love Libraries Grant. Many of you already know about this program, but for those who don’t, this is the lowdown.
To enter, each library must complete the entry form and upload a photo of one or more of their library staff holding three books in their collection by Sisters in Crime authors. Libraries can find a list of our members by choosing the word Resources in the side menu on our web site, and then clicking on SinC Authors. (Click here for the link to the entry form.)
After the random drawing on the last business day of the month, the winning library will be contacted and announced. And then we’ll all pop corks to celebrate the winner! What’s not to celebrate about free money for books?
All branches within a larger system may enter. However, once a library in any given system wins, no other libraries within that system can win the grant. Those not successful in one month will automatically be entered for subsequent drawings. Grants must be used to purchase books and may not be used for general operating expenses. Book purchases are not restricted to the mystery genre, nor to those by Sisters in Crime members. All we ask is that we be allowed to post the winners photos on our website.
Where do individual members of sisters in crime come in? Most of us live in cities or towns with one or more libraries. Why not visit those libraries and give each one the message about the We Love Libraries Grants in person. You’ll not only look like a star, but you might get one of your books into the library photograph. To me, this is what Win/Win looks like!
Here are the winners so far.
In just a few days, our newest library winner will be announced, so stay tuned.
We all know that librarians rock. Without a vibrant, active library system in our communities, all of our lives would be greatly diminished. So lets get out there and spread the word. Sisters in Crime loves libraries!
Yup, Sisters in Crime did. And not just any free money. I’m talking about the We Love Libraries Grant. Many of you already know about this program, but for those who don’t, this is the lowdown.
From January through December of 2010, Sisters in Crime will award a $1,000 grant. At the end of each month, a winner will be drawn from entries received at our website, http://www.sistersincrime.org/. Only U.S. libraries may enter the drawing.
To enter, each library must complete the entry form and upload a photo of one or more of their library staff holding three books in their collection by Sisters in Crime authors. Libraries can find a list of our members by choosing the word Resources in the side menu on our web site, and then clicking on SinC Authors. (Click here for the link to the entry form.)
After the random drawing on the last business day of the month, the winning library will be contacted and announced. And then we’ll all pop corks to celebrate the winner! What’s not to celebrate about free money for books?
All branches within a larger system may enter. However, once a library in any given system wins, no other libraries within that system can win the grant. Those not successful in one month will automatically be entered for subsequent drawings. Grants must be used to purchase books and may not be used for general operating expenses. Book purchases are not restricted to the mystery genre, nor to those by Sisters in Crime members. All we ask is that we be allowed to post the winners photos on our website.
Where do individual members of sisters in crime come in? Most of us live in cities or towns with one or more libraries. Why not visit those libraries and give each one the message about the We Love Libraries Grants in person. You’ll not only look like a star, but you might get one of your books into the library photograph. To me, this is what Win/Win looks like!
Here are the winners so far.
January: Kingstowne Library in Alexandria, Virginia
February: Kraemer Family Library, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Colorado
March: Pineville-Bell County Public Library in Pineville, Kentucky
In just a few days, our newest library winner will be announced, so stay tuned.
We all know that librarians rock. Without a vibrant, active library system in our communities, all of our lives would be greatly diminished. So lets get out there and spread the word. Sisters in Crime loves libraries!
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
WEDNESDAY'S BURNING QUESTION
In the late eighties, when I was first published, I had my reasons for deciding to write under a pen name. For one, my last name is almost unpronounceable. I chose a pen name because I didn’t want to spend the next year or two of my life listening to people people murder the pronunciation. My friend M.D. Lake chose his pen name after his publisher encouraged him to write under one to obscure the fact that he was a man.
Today’s burning question is: Did you ever consider writing pseudonymously? If so, why. Are you happy with your decision to write-- or not to write--under your own name?
Monday, April 19, 2010
The Origin of Ideas
http://www.nerowolfe.org/
Where do ideas come from? Do they come to you fully developed or do they start as a tiny kernel and grow? Different authors take different approaches.
For instance, Ellen Hart says, “I write to a title—it always comes first. The title helps me think my way into the story thematically.” She explains that for an idea to translate into a novel-worthy plot, it has to resonate with her. “It seems that if the story doesn't bubble up from inside me, from my own interests and passions, it doesn't take hold.”
Louise Ure also writes the title first, and uses it to inspire her novel. “I only get one idea per year,” she says. “For me, everything starts with a title ... those strange collections of overheard words that twist in my mind. Forcing Amaryllis was a gardening tag that blossomed into a story of rape. The Fault Tree was part of the radio announcement about the Challenger spacecraft disaster that turned into a place for the punishment of a young girl. Once I've got the title, the rest is easy.”
Several authors, like Louise, get ideas from the news. Hank Phillipi Ryan, for example, uses her background as a journalist to inspire ideas. “I’m a reporter, so my life revolves around breaking news stories,” she says. “For the last thirty years, I’ve thought ‘is this a story?’ at every overheard conversation, newspaper article, magazine cover, airplane trip, or random encounter at a cocktail party. Finding a good story—whether for TV news or for fiction—requires curiosity. You have to think, ‘What if he’s lying?’ It requires cynicism: ‘What if that system doesn’t work the way it’s supposed to?’ And it requires confidence: ‘What if I can find out what really happened?’ In other words, everything is the beginning nugget of a story. You just have to see the world as full of possibilities. It’s all about ‘what if?’ Taking a step into ‘what if’ is a taking step into your next adventure.”
Rosemary Harris also uses the news as a source of ideas. “Where do I get ideas? The newspaper. As long as people keep doing stupid things I will have plenty of ideas.”
Some authors rely on personal experiences. Carolyn Hart says, “Book themes and many scenes often flow from a remembered event, emotion, person, or place.”
That’s how it works for me, too. For instance, about twenty-five years ago, when I was in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, I visited a woman’s house. It was a business call—I owned a rare bookstore and she wanted to sell her books. I was there to look at them and make an offer. She was older, about 75 at that time. Her house was distinctly middle class, but her decorations were anything but. Every inch of wall space was covered with oil paintings. I spotted a Van Dyke, two Renoirs, and a Matisse. They weren’t arranged artfully; they were wedged in, one on top of another. She mentioned that her brother had brought them home from the War. More than twenty years later, I read an article about how Holocaust survivors and their heirs were suing for the return of the art the Nazis had methodically ripped off the walls of Jewish homes. For me, it was an epiphany—it was as if someone had slapped me awake. The art on that woman’s walls weren’t the carefully chosen objects of a devoted art collector; they were the bounty of a thief. And that’s the origin of the plot of Consigned to Death, the first Josie Prescott antiques mystery.
The lesson here is there’s no one way to come up with ideas; there are lots of effective approaches. Whether from personal experiences or newsworthy events; whether you plot from a title or an actual event, the overarching message seems to be that the best ideas are those that touch your heart and fire your imagination.
Jane K. Cleland’s multiple award-nominated and IMBA best selling Josie Prescott Antiques Mystery series [St. Martin’s Minotaur] has been reviewed as an Antiques Roadshow for mystery fans. “Josie” stories have also appeared in Alfred Hitchcock Mystery Magazine. Jane chairs the Wolfe Pack’s literary awards, which include the Nero Award and the Black Orchid Novella Award, granted in partnership with Alfred Hitchcock Mystery Magazine. She is a past chapter president and current board member of the Mystery Writers of America/New York Chapter. Visit her website: http://www.janecleland.net/
Friday, April 16, 2010
Cats love iPad, too!
Soon they'll be downloading books, as well!
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
WEDNESDAY'S BURNING QUESTION
Ellen Hart writes:
Social networking. Facebook. Twitter. Linkedin. MySpace. Yup, it’s here to stay.
Is it worth the effort?
Is it a black hole, sucking our time and our brains into the abyss?
Is it something in between?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



























